| 00:00:00 | IS JUST PART OF DEMOCRACY. |
| 00:00:05 | SO HER TIME AS SOLICITOR GENERAL WHERE SHE REPRESENTS THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WAS REASSURING TO ME. |
| 00:00:15 | SHE HAS HAD FRONTLINE EXPERIENCE ON THE WAR ON TERROR. |
| 00:00:21 | SHE HAS ARGUED BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT THAT TERROR SUSPECTS SHOULD BE VIEWED UNDER THE LAW OF WAR. |
| 00:00:28 | SHE SUPPORTS THE IDEA THAT SOMEONE WHO JOINS AL QAEDA HASN'T COMMITTED A CRIME, THEY HAVE TAKEN UP ARMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, AND THEY CAN BE HELD INDEFINITELY WITHOUT TRIAL IF UNDER PROPER PROCEDURES THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE PART OF THE ENEMY FORCE. |
| 00:00:47 | SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT DETAINEES HELD AT BAGHRAN BAGRAM AIR BASE IN AFGHANISTAN SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE THEY ARE PRISONERS OF WAR IN AN ACTIVE THEATER OF COMBAT. |
| 00:01:02 | IF SHE GETS ON THE COURT -- AND I'M CERTAIN SHE WILL -- SHE WILL BE ABLE TO BRING TO THAT COURT SOME FRONTLINE REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE IN THE WAR ON TERROR. |
| 00:01:12 | SHE HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPRESENT THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT, ARGUING THAT THIS NATION IS AT WAR AND THE PEOPLE WHO ATTACK US -- ATTACKED US ON 9/11 AND WHO CONTINUE TO JOIN AL QAEDA ARE NOT COMMON CRIMINALS BUT PEOPLE SUBJECT TO THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT. |
| 00:01:34 | HER TESTIMONY WHEN SHE WAS CONFIRMED FOR SOLICITOR GENERAL WAS REASSURING TO ME THAT SHE UNDERSTOOD THAT VERY IMPORTANT CONCEPT. |
| 00:01:44 | HOW SHE RULES, I DON'T KNOW. |
| 00:01:45 | I EXPECT THAT SHE WILL BE MORE LIKE JUSTICE STEVENS IN THE WAY SHE DECIDES CASES. |
| 00:01:55 | THE |
Loading...